We provide technical evidence that can support AI governance and AI Act readiness discussions — risk management, documentation, monitoring and robustness, prepared for review.
High-risk AI systems need technical evidence behind their documentation. We help teams assemble that evidence — robustness, bias, monitoring and human-oversight support — so governance and AI Act readiness conversations rest on real testing, not a slide.
One principle: before trusting a system, we try to break it — in a controlled, documented way. We work across context, data, performance, calibration, robustness, bias, drift, fragility, overfitting and operational risk, then summarize a Proof Score and recommendations.
Scoped per system; typically a Model Assurance Report (from €2,500) plus documentation support.
Related: Model Risk Management AI · Independent Model Validation · Methodology · Pricing · Sample report · Contact
No. We are not a notified body and do not certify AI Act conformity. We provide technical evidence that can support readiness discussions.
Robustness, bias and fairness, monitoring and human-oversight support, plus documentation aligned to governance needs.
Yes. Regulatory interpretation should be handled by qualified legal counsel; our evidence supports that review.